Stories behind the Revelations

Doctrine and Covenants section 19 commanded Martin Harris to sell his property to pay for the printing of the Book of Mormon. Section 19 was traditionally dated March 1830, but recent research suggests that Joseph Smith likely received this revelation in the summer of 1829. Why is this change significant?

In June 1829, Martin Harris and Joseph Smith had negotiated with several printers regarding the publication of the Book of Mormon, finally reaching an agreement with E. B. Grandin of Palmyra. John H. Gilbert, the typesetter who worked for Grandin, recalled that Harris had promised to pay for the cost of the printing, which would come to $3,000 for 5,000 copies. According to Grandin’s brother-in-law, “Harris became for a time in some degree staggered in his confidence; but nothing could be done in the way of printing without his aid.”² Grandin refused to begin the work unless Harris paid up front.

It was likely during this time of Harris’s hesitation that Joseph Smith received the revelation urging Harris to pay the printer. Harris followed the Lord’s instructions. On August 25, 1829, he mortgaged his property and gave the mortgage to Grandin, who then sold it for cash. At this point, the printing of the Book of Mormon was paid in full. By March 1830, the payment had already been made, Harris had no more land, and the books were already rolling off the press, so it would make little sense for this revelation to have come then. In the summer of 1829, however, as Harris hesitated, the Lord’s chastisement and encouragement led to his going forward with the difficult decision to mortgage his property so the Book of Mormon could be published.³

Image

section 47 and John Whitmer

The early Saints had great confidence in Joseph Smith as a revelator. Section 47, received by Joseph Smith in March 1831, called John Whitmer, who was already serving as a clerk to Joseph Smith, to keep a history of the Church. Joseph Smith had asked Whitmer to also keep a narrative history (rather than to simply record or copy records), but Whitmer initially hesitated. The new heading to the section quotes from Whitmer himself and demonstrates both his internal struggle and his faith. In his history, he wrote, “I would rather not do it but observed that the will of the Lord be done, and if he desires it, I desire that he would manifest it through Joseph the Seer.”⁴

The Lord then spoke through Joseph Smith, extending and explaining this calling to Whitmer and also promising him the aid of the Comforter. Whitmer, now assured that the calling came by revelation, accepted it and began to keep the Church history.⁵

One change to the heading of section 49 is the date: May 7, 1831, rather than March 1831.⁶ Why does it make a difference whether the revelation was received in March or on May 7?

In section 49, the Lord directs Parley P. Pratt, Sidney Rigdon, and Leman Copley to take a revelation to the nearby Shaker community of North Union near Cleveland, Ohio, and call the people to repentance. The three men chosen for this mission all had knowledge of and ties to Shakers. Copley had been a Shaker briefly, Rigdon had admired Shaker communalism and interacted with them, and Pratt had grown up in the shadow of their main community of New Lebanon, New York. Furthermore, Pratt, along with Oliver Cowdery and a few others, had visited the Ohio Shakers and left several copies of the Book of Mormon with them many months earlier.

Why is the date of their receiving this assignment significant? Historical records demonstrate that Sidney Rigdon and Leman Copley arrived in North Union on the evening of Saturday, May 7, and Parley P. Pratt arrived the following morning. If the revelation was given in March 1830, this would indicate a delay of some two months between the time it was given and the time the men acted on it. Such a delay would be understandable, given the daunting assignment they had received to travel to the Shakers and call them to repentance.

However, we now know the revelation was received on May 7, the same day that the men left to preach to the Shakers. After Joseph Smith received the revelation, the men did not pause and consider their difficult assignment for weeks. Rather, they left immediately. This simple date change gives us a glimpse of the faithfulness and obedience of these men.⁷

Information in the manuscript revelation books led to a refinement in the traditional date and place given for the revelation in section 66. Rather than being received on October 25, 1831, in Orange, Ohio, the revelation was actually received four days later, on October 29, in Hiram, Ohio. Research in William McLellin’s journal and his later writings also provide a richer context to this revelation.

A recent convert, McLellin first met Joseph Smith at a conference in Orange, Ohio, held October 25 and 26, where McLellin was ordained to the high priesthood. McLellin then traveled with Joseph to Hiram, Ohio, where he “went before the Lord in secret, and on my knees asked him to reveal the answer to five questions through his Prophet.” Like many other recent converts, McLellin then asked for a revelation that would provide direction in his personal life. Joseph Smith received a revelation, now known as section 66, which McLellin said answered his questions “to my full and entire satisfaction.”⁸ In his journal that day, McLellin wrote that the questions “had dwelt upon my mind with anxiety yet with uncertainty.” He also wrote, “The Lord condescended to hear my prayer and give me a revelation of his will, through his prophet or seer (Joseph).”⁹

McLellin’s writings demonstrate that he believed the Lord answered the five specific questions he wanted Joseph Smith to answer, questions he had not shared with Joseph. This interaction shows how deeply the early Church members believed in Joseph’s ability to receive revelation.¹⁰

The revised section headings give us insight into the people the revelations were directed to. Perhaps we can relate to the hesitation of Martin Harris or John Whitmer when Harris was asked to sacrifice for the gospel and Whitmer was directed to take on a difficult assignment for which he may not have felt qualified. Perhaps we sometimes feel like Sidney Rigdon, Parley P. Pratt, and Leman Copley in their enthusiastic and immediate response.

The historical record demonstrates how greatly the early Saints valued Joseph Smith’s revelations. This is partly shown in the painstaking way in which John Whitmer and others recorded the revelations in the manuscript revelation books and by how other Saints recorded copies for themselves before the revelations were published.

In a Church conference in November 1831, in which members decided to publish Joseph Smith’s revelations and print 10,000 copies (at a time when the members of the Church could be counted in the hundreds), the conference declared that the revelations were “worth to the Church the riches of the whole Earth.”¹¹ We see this in the responses of individuals to the revelations. When the Lord spoke through Joseph the Seer, Martin Harris mortgaged his property to pay for the Book of Mormon; John Whitmer took up his pen to write Church history; Sidney Rigdon, Leman Copley, and Parley P. Pratt left immediately to take the revelation to the Shakers; and William McLellin believed his private questions were answered.

If we take these revelations as seriously as the early Saints did—and if we take the principle of revelation and the possibility of revelation in our own lives just as seriously—we, like them, will be able to declare that the revelations are truly “worth to the Church the riches of the whole Earth.”